19 July 2010
I've 'virtually' moved...
I've moved my blogs over to Wordpress... only because I like their templates better. But creating the blogs in edit mode is not easier.
Anyway, please follow me to Bi-focal Views at glenmont.wordpress.com.
Scatter-shots at
glenmont2.wordpress.com
privateLIVES and PUBLICfaces at glenmont3.wordpress.com
toodles for now...
See you there.
Michael
13 June 2010
21 February 2010
A Bi-focal view: Landed a job - finally - February 2010.
13 June update...The following blog from February 2010 has been edited a bit. I wanted to preserve the essence of my feelings when I landed the job at the university. But since I was, as the saying goes, unceremoniously let go less then four months later, I think it best to edit out identifying remarks. The video blog from 12th June conveys my surprise, consternation and ...etc... but I think it best not to be too specific as to department and faculty. But the gist is absolutely honest.
February 2010
Several months ago, I wrote a dirge about how difficult it was getting a 'decent' job at my age of 57/58. While I don't retract any of that, I have finally succeeded in getting a position that is a good fit for employer and employee.
I've done graduate research into retirement - really I have! - and for several years the business press has almost burst its margins with gloom and doom articles about the coming labour shortage. After some time off work and a move back to my home province (and some static from an insurer re a disability claim), I took early retirement a while back.
My intention was not to return to the same level of employment (nor remuneration, of course), as I was burnt out from the workplace politics and ... well... just burnt out from hearing loss, depression and the usual psychological complications besides the workplace complications. My ultimate plan was to work on my writing, do a lot more reading, rest up and then become a semi- not a full-retiree. I had hoped to get involved again with teaching business management, marketing theory or organizational development/behaviour to adults. But it didn't work out that way when I came up against union seniority lists (and that is not a negative, just a reality).
While occasional or part-time work was my goal, I was open to the correct full-time position, but couldn't land it. My experience and credentials piqued interest but then seemed to scare off recruitment panels - my feeling being that my intention to dial-down my work was suspect - misinterpreted as me hiding something negative rather than offering champagne skills on a beer salary. I have a decent pension and didn't want to build another career, but rather offer good value at a job.
My covering letters were eloquent, passionate and truthful. I started thinking being too truthful was becoming a negative, but integrity finally found someone who listened rather than misjudged. My values, my experience (i.e my age) and my enthusiasm were received as positives and not negatives. The job needed someone who could start and not need a long incubation, and someone familiar with post-secondary politics as well as moving change forward.
My new position in a local university has a lot of clerical work, but I knew that going in. But the job calls for a lot of faculty interaction, needing someone who can work collegially, but also be willing to be firm when necessary - not to disrespect anyone, but to be a departmental champion as well as occasional shield. I am enjoying my job's variety, as I bounce from my office to meetings back to office tasks.
My goal has long been to return to the university of my undergrad days i some capacity, and I've managed to do that. It is exciting, at least to me, to be part of the educational experience, even as a backroom player. But I know that the better and more productive the processes that I administer, the better the faculty and student experience.So, I have moved frombitter to better. And my friends and family have noticed that I seem to be happier than I've been in months. You know... I must have missed being in charge, as that's really all I've been for most of my career. And now I am again, but on a smaller canvas - and I am very pleased about that.
_________________________________________________________________
Several months ago, I wrote a dirge about how difficult it was getting a 'decent' job at my age of 57/58. While I don't retract any of that, I have finally succeeded in getting a position that is a good fit for employer and employee.
I've done graduate research into retirement - really I have! - and for several years the business press has almost burst its margins with gloom and doom articles about the coming labour shortage. After some time off work and a move back to my home province (and some static from an insurer re a disability claim), I took early retirement a while back.
My intention was not to return to the same level of employment (nor remuneration, of course), as I was burnt out from the workplace politics and ... well... just burnt out from hearing loss, depression and the usual psychological complications besides the workplace complications. My ultimate plan was to work on my writing, do a lot more reading, rest up and then become a semi- not a full-retiree. I had hoped to get involved again with teaching business management, marketing theory or organizational development/behaviour to adults. But it didn't work out that way when I came up against union seniority lists (and that is not a negative, just a reality).
While occasional or part-time work was my goal, I was open to the correct full-time position, but couldn't land it. My experience and credentials piqued interest but then seemed to scare off recruitment panels - my feeling being that my intention to dial-down my work was suspect - misinterpreted as me hiding something negative rather than offering champagne skills on a beer salary. I have a decent pension and didn't want to build another career, but rather offer good value at a job.
My covering letters were eloquent, passionate and truthful. I started thinking being too truthful was becoming a negative, but integrity finally found someone who listened rather than misjudged. My values, my experience (i.e my age) and my enthusiasm were received as positives and not negatives. The job needed someone who could start and not need a long incubation, and someone familiar with post-secondary politics as well as moving change forward.
My new position in a local university has a lot of clerical work, but I knew that going in. But the job calls for a lot of faculty interaction, needing someone who can work collegially, but also be willing to be firm when necessary - not to disrespect anyone, but to be a departmental champion as well as occasional shield. I am enjoying my job's variety, as I bounce from my office to meetings back to office tasks.
My goal has long been to return to the university of my undergrad days i some capacity, and I've managed to do that. It is exciting, at least to me, to be part of the educational experience, even as a backroom player. But I know that the better and more productive the processes that I administer, the better the faculty and student experience.So, I have moved frombitter to better. And my friends and family have noticed that I seem to be happier than I've been in months. You know... I must have missed being in charge, as that's really all I've been for most of my career. And now I am again, but on a smaller canvas - and I am very pleased about that.
Labels:
aging workforce,
semi-retired
04 January 2010
A Bi-focal view: what happened to taking some time to t-h-i-n-k....
I set up a Twitter account a few months back to see if I could derive pleasure or productivity from it. I stopped using it a few weeks later.
It was so tedious, perhaps because I don't use a web-phone but a PC. Things are not live if you're going on once a day like I was.
From what I've seen and heard, many people are addicted to it, and from what I could see on the feeds, most of the tweets are junk. (Perhaps not the political news out of Iran, a few months back, but the what I'm doing now type of scribbles. I don't want to know if anyone is at the dry cleaners.)
I do have a cell phone (since 1993 I've gone through at least six versions, but only for the occasional phone call. I actually don't like talking on the phone all that much and can go days without a call.) While I prefer e-mail and do enjoy going on-line for some amusement, I seem to have missed much of the techno-addictions of the last decade:
We all have our cell phone stories of annoyance, but the phones are a wonderful device and do serve a purpose. But talking loudly on the bus isn't really one of them. And I've been at a urinal when the guy next to me is balancing his phone between shoulder and ear, and trying to pee without missing a syllable. (And, no, he didn't wash his hands when he left - just think about that when using someone's phone.) Aside from annoyance is rudeness: it is not a proper use of a mobile phone to be chatting with a friend while going through a supermarket checkout - I think this tends to dehumanize the person working on processing your groceries - don't you?
In the real olden days... you know... about 5 - 10 years ago, friends would get on a bus and talk to each other, or people on their own would read a book or just look out the window, perhaps inadvertently interacting with strangers. But with so many people wired to iPODS, there is an obvious diminishing of sociability. You don't have to love everybody, but some eye contact used to be inevitable. Now, it isn't.
The irony is not lost on me that I'm using a now ubiquitous social networking application, Blogger, to disseminate my thoughts on modern technology, especially communication apps and devices. While I believe in doing a job well, and using technologies to assist me in my work, I do not believe in being forever tethered to the workplace. If you have no down time, then perhaps you're in the wrong job.
I tend to think of iPODS as cocoons of isolation, and Blackberrys et al as squirrel cages of instant communication. Aren't you just spinning your wheels, playing at productivity more so than achieving a satisfying life-work balance?
In the end, even though I'm not anti-technology but anti-all-consuming technology, my skepticism as to the purpose or my cynicism as to the value, may be a generational thing with me. I can touch type on a keyboard, use full sentences, and communicate full concepts - double-spaced and mostly grammatically correct. But I cannot type with my thumbs, and use kewl abbreviations such as LOL, OMG, FWIW, NSFW, with any degree of sincerity or lack of awareness.
It was so tedious, perhaps because I don't use a web-phone but a PC. Things are not live if you're going on once a day like I was.
From what I've seen and heard, many people are addicted to it, and from what I could see on the feeds, most of the tweets are junk. (Perhaps not the political news out of Iran, a few months back, but the what I'm doing now type of scribbles. I don't want to know if anyone is at the dry cleaners.)
I do have a cell phone (since 1993 I've gone through at least six versions, but only for the occasional phone call. I actually don't like talking on the phone all that much and can go days without a call.) While I prefer e-mail and do enjoy going on-line for some amusement, I seem to have missed much of the techno-addictions of the last decade:
- text-ing or sext-ing
- uploading pictures (nude or risque) to the web (though I do have benign photos on facebook)
- iPHONES
- iPODS or other portable music pendants
- GPS in my car - I think maps are more convenient
- bluetooth for my mobile phone
- any video game
- electronic books (I prefer the perfect design of a real book - you know... the kind between two covers)
- Blackberrys - I don't have enough correspondents to justify this.
- touch-tone phones (we first had them in Nova Scotia in 1968) - today's young people may not know how to dial a phone
- VCR - a video cassette recorder for the TV - my first one in 1981 cost $1500.00, and had a cord between the remote buttons and the fake wood finish. (My first blank tape cost me $28.00!!!)
- my first computer was an Apple II, purchased in 1984 - home computers were still not all that common then. Have you seen what you can now get for $2,000.00???
- CD player - Ted bought one when they were introduced in 1984
- Laser-disk player in late 1980s. We were used to paying $50.00 - $100.00+ for LDs
- We had a DVD player almost as soon as they came out - over $700.00 when introduced - now they're given away as freebees!!!
- HDTV - first one in 2004 cost $3,000.00+ (an LCD back-projection... I don't think Sony makes them now)
We all have our cell phone stories of annoyance, but the phones are a wonderful device and do serve a purpose. But talking loudly on the bus isn't really one of them. And I've been at a urinal when the guy next to me is balancing his phone between shoulder and ear, and trying to pee without missing a syllable. (And, no, he didn't wash his hands when he left - just think about that when using someone's phone.) Aside from annoyance is rudeness: it is not a proper use of a mobile phone to be chatting with a friend while going through a supermarket checkout - I think this tends to dehumanize the person working on processing your groceries - don't you?
In the real olden days... you know... about 5 - 10 years ago, friends would get on a bus and talk to each other, or people on their own would read a book or just look out the window, perhaps inadvertently interacting with strangers. But with so many people wired to iPODS, there is an obvious diminishing of sociability. You don't have to love everybody, but some eye contact used to be inevitable. Now, it isn't.
The irony is not lost on me that I'm using a now ubiquitous social networking application, Blogger, to disseminate my thoughts on modern technology, especially communication apps and devices. While I believe in doing a job well, and using technologies to assist me in my work, I do not believe in being forever tethered to the workplace. If you have no down time, then perhaps you're in the wrong job.
I tend to think of iPODS as cocoons of isolation, and Blackberrys et al as squirrel cages of instant communication. Aren't you just spinning your wheels, playing at productivity more so than achieving a satisfying life-work balance?
In the end, even though I'm not anti-technology but anti-all-consuming technology, my skepticism as to the purpose or my cynicism as to the value, may be a generational thing with me. I can touch type on a keyboard, use full sentences, and communicate full concepts - double-spaced and mostly grammatically correct. But I cannot type with my thumbs, and use kewl abbreviations such as LOL, OMG, FWIW, NSFW, with any degree of sincerity or lack of awareness.
A Bi-focal view: Colonoscopies
This cartoon from the New Yorker, 18 May 2009, could be about me and my siblings.
My oldest brother had cancer (yes, down there), so I think we've all had colonoscopies. I've had two in six years, as we're supposed to have them no later than five years apart, now that we're all in our fifties and have cancer in the family.
This procedure does indeed become a subject of conversation - even around the dinner table. The prep is horrendous (the purging of your system), but the procedure itself is painless.
My oldest brother had cancer (yes, down there), so I think we've all had colonoscopies. I've had two in six years, as we're supposed to have them no later than five years apart, now that we're all in our fifties and have cancer in the family.
This procedure does indeed become a subject of conversation - even around the dinner table. The prep is horrendous (the purging of your system), but the procedure itself is painless.
Labels:
colonoscopy
26 December 2009
A Bi-focal view: The inertia of shopping...
A couple of years back, I returned to the east coast after almost 3 decades in Vancouver, so I am familiar with the Boxing Day phenomenon(?)] as alluded to in today's Vancouver Sun: Those shopping for electronics encountered the longest lines. At Best Buy on Cambie Street, shoppers began lining up at midnight, said spokesman Scott Morris, adding that by 6 a.m. there were about 600 people waiting.I wouldn't dream of shopping for bargains on Boxing Day, particularly in the packed electronics stores. Bemused is what I am, as I value Boxing Day as a day of rest from a busy or stressful year-end, not as an additional day in which to extend purchasing. But then again, many people do not get that I like to spend hours in my home library reading books and periodicals on Christmas Day or Boxing Day.
The Boxing Day frenzy is as recurrent as lint in your navel. There are at least five yawningly predictable news stories that have become cliches in Vancouver media - the mercantile and mercenary tradition is just one:
- Polar Bear Swim in English Bay on New Year's Day
- The Vancouver Sun Run in April
- The fireworks finale in August
- The leather- and drag-queens from the Pride Parade
- The over-night Boxing Day line-ups outside electronics mega-stores
Since I have never been addicted to the mass Xmas accumulation addiction or felt the need for more than a handful of gift-giving (actually gift-exchanging), I just don't get it. The pleasure inherent in leaving a warm home on Christmas Day and hauling a lawn chair to the cold downtown streets to start the overnight vigil strikes me as non-Christmasy. The 27th is time enough to look for purported bargains - the stores don't want to lose money, meaning many of the specials are specious. I have worked retail and opening stores as early as 6 a.m. is just cruel to the employees - already mostly poorly paid and with only one day between horrendous crowds. At least, here in Nova Scotia, the stores are closed on Boxing Day, the madness delayed by a day.
That's my screed on Boxing Day. To each his own, but surely people could slow down for more than one day.
_____________________________
The photo above is from Sydney Australia in 2008, but looks just like the footage I saw today on a Vancouver news broadcast.
Labels:
Boxing Day,
consumerism
21 December 2009
A Bi-focal view: Frugal can make for a stress-free Xmas
We are shaped by our environment... The past is prologue... Everything old is new again.
There are many other aphorisms that apply to how our past or childhood precipitates our present behaviour. People experience Christmas differently - it's not always about accumulation of gifts but that seems to be the point for most people (or am I being too cynical?). One thing I have noted over the years is the ubiquitous, majority expression of exhaustion and the tinge of disappointment inherent in the phrase that can be heard as early as Christmas morning: I'm glad that's over with!
We may seek to have a great Christmas, we may choose to avoid Christmas as much as that is even possible, and we may have a different kind of Christmas thrust upon us. I wonder if Christmas even exists in the present. Isn't the current Christmas usually a bust that cannot stand up to our past memories or our future aspirations? Isn't gift-giving or gift-exchanging the central element now, with friends and family perhaps taking a back seat to it all?
When it comes to the nexus of purchasing, giving and receiving gifts, those without extra money may feel compelled to spend because of societal or peer pressure. The working poor with children try to give the kids a facimile of a Christmas full of presents, but the kids are aware of what's hot and what the other kids got for Christmas - the influences and the result of affluence are everywhere. Those with money can buy presents but the turbo treadmill of trying to out-do last year's present or to compete with friends or family is exhausting and ultimately hollow, isn't it? Then there is a real minority - those of us who basically opt out, choosing not to get too involved with the whole mercantile or status elements of Christmas.
My real Christmas lives on in my memories. The best is not today, nor tomorrow, but the present day can bring its own rewards exclusive of gift to-and-fro. Growing up in a large family is a great equalizer; for many years there were eight kids home with my father the only wage earner. We were never so poor that we went hungry or homeless. Quite the contrary, always a roof over our heads and a meal on the table. But it was not an affluent upbringing as we learned about hand-me-downs and how to make do. I give a salute to my parents as they still managed to give us wonderful Christmases bereft of fancy celebrations.
Being raised Catholic, getting to Midnight Mass was a big deal, and the rest of the holidays radiated from that central act. We started our celebrations as soon as we got home. As bona fide Christmas stockings were rare in our home, and there was no fireplace for many years, we used our father's work socks. When they were in short supply, we used dinner bowls for our goodies: an orange, an apple, a banana, lots of nuts, grapes and chocolates and hard candy (I can still taste the Lowney's hard candy that came in a metal bucket...hmmm). Most winters we received a new coat or rubber boots, as the necessities had to do double-duty as presents. But we did enjoy our presents, be they board games or a toboggan.
In big families you learn to grow up fast, as there isn't a lot of time nor energy to go around. We didn't have parents fretting over our activities; self-reliance was expected. As the years went by, there were still perhaps six children of school and high school age living on our father's small wages as a Commissionaire and his various small pensions. During this time, even before puberty took over, my mother would give me money to do the Christmas present-shopping for the family, as she just never went shopping. (She was so inured to virtually having the life force drained out of her from having so many children that she never learned how to enjoy or even partake of many normal housewife activities such as window shopping, or shopping for clothes for herself, and not even supermarket shopping.) I can recall being the preternatural consumer in the house, thus the designated shopper. I even had to drag the gifts for my siblings home on the bus, by myself. (I can't imagine today's kids carrying lots of money like I was and taking public transit to make decisions for the family. Can you?) As we got older, Mom just handed us $20.00 bills and we did our own shopping. Once the belief in Santa is extinguished, I still think money is the best way to go. This model is now evidenced by the popularity of gift cards - zero responsibility or guilt on the gift-giver's part and much satisfaction on the gift-ee's part.
Pulling away from gift-giving really started for me about two decades ago. One year, within two months, my partner lost his job and I ended up on strike for about five weeks. Without notice we were impoverished and having trouble making the rent for a couple of months, and our downtown Vancouver rent was quite high. While the labour issues were resolved for me, the cumulative fiscal hit continued for a long, long time as we became a one-income family. That Christmas I advised my friends and family that there would be no presents - we couldn't afford it and we requested that no one give us presents - that would only make us feel worse. (I've always been candid.)
The next year, as we started to regain our fiscal footing, we did not go back to the old way, as we went from zero gift-exchanging to giving presents only to our parents. Occasionally there would be a small present exchanged between us - a book or a disc - but we were more likely to take a vacation or have people in. We tried not to compromise on hosting and attending a few dinner parties. To this day, that remains our Christmas tradition - we never went back to exchanging presents with friends or family once our parents passed on.
We're quite happy with this arrangement, and avoid a lot of stress. Being familiar with our chosen model of frugal Christmases has again come in handy as this year we're enduring some fiscal discombobulation. Neither of us has worked since moving east over two years ago (some health issues for sure) and we're back to being a one-income family living on my pension. Our issues are about long-term fiscal security and health, not Christmas trees and shiny presents. Exchanging gifts is simply not a stress-inducer for us, and I have never missed it.
Over the years I've had many people compliment me or express envy, but never emulate our stance on gift exchanging. The follow-up comment has usually been "I just couldn't do it". What they "just couldn't do" is what I found/find the easiest thing - advising people that you're opting out of the gifting aspect but not the social aspect. This has worked well for us, and continues to be a major part of our Christmas season. I have no buyer's remorse on Boxing Day and always a delicious meal under my belt.
There is another tonic to gift-gluttony - charity to those less fortunate. It may be a cliche but as I get older, I want to give more though I have less. This year I have less than last year, so my charity really does begin at home. It was different last year. I actually won money in one of those hospital lotteries. At the time, I recalled an article that the food bank needed money more than food as they could expend a dollar to purchase 3 or 4 times its value. I took my cheque and signed it over to them with the knowledge that substantive not trivial good would result. Giving that money away last year was my sole Christmas gift, in-coming or out-going and I honestly, truly, without artifice, felt like I had received a present. I guess it really is the thought that counts!
One final thing: If we had kids, like so many exhausted but giddy parents before us, we would make Christmas revolve around them, but put a lid on it and not over-indulge them. Overkill is not necessary and moderation in all things. So... having lots of presents may not have been a big part of my life, but the Christmas nuts, candy and fruit continue and the main HUGE meal continues as the most adhesive of glue for our Christmases.
Labels:
Christmas gifts,
Christmas traditions.,
frugal Xmas
16 December 2009
A Bi-focal view: Same-sex marriage; Washington DC; intolerance of far right and the uber-religious
Note: This post is also on my other blog SCATTER-SHOTS at michael-snaps.blogspot.com
===============================Personally, I was never the biggest supporter of same-sex marriage (a term I prefer to gay marriage, which sounds rather madcap and frivolous to me). My partner wasn't (isn't?) either. But a funny thing happened on the way to the church, so to speak.
NO, I'm not getting married.... BUT... the rabid forces against the idea of calling civil unions "marriage", brought out a fiery activist side that I wasn't sure I had. While I can be and am known to be out-spoken, which really means I have an opinion and here it is, I believe in free speech, and the right of others (even if they are racist, prejudiced, and just old ignorant on topics of civil/human rights) to say what they think. (Though I don't think people should classify incitement to violence as free speech so much as hate crime.)
There has been a lot of victories on the side of same-sex marriage in the states this year. And those of us in Canada, Belgium, Spain, and Sweden(?) already enjoy this privilege to marry our significant others. But the barrier is, unreservedly, linked to prejudices perpetuated by people self-characterized as Christian, family-oriented, or religious. The argument is always to keep something away from gay people, as if we cannot be trusted to handle it with care. This position is just hateful - there is no other adjective that really describes it.
As has been shown again and again, but which the religious right (even though elected to institutions that are officially separate from Church) refuses to acknowledge nor analyze, is that gay people do make good citizens and can be trusted not to abuse marriage any more than straight people have already done:
- The most obvious example these days is Tiger Woods and his baker's dozen of mistresses, courtesans, and groupies. He's been fucking his way around the world, while putting out an image of family man and positive values.
- Myriad American senators who purport to be Christian and honourable, and then have affairs with the opposite sex, or solicit same-sex shenanigans.
- There are many leading lights who have been married multiple times, but they stand for family values.
- EG: Newt Gingrich had a girl on the side while his first wife was dying.
- I believe Dr. Phil has been married twice.
- Larry King has been married seven times... but he has said that he is old-fashioned, in that he doesn't like to have affairs, but prefers marriage!
- Various Kennedys have had marriages annulled, even after having children. That's the hypocrisy of the Catholic Church: support the rich Kennedys but not a monogamous gay man. (Oh, and the Kennedys are not against same-sex marriage.)
- The preponderance of family men to slaughter their families (too many to mention).
- Uganda planning to pass a law that could result in federally-sanctioned execution of gay men. (The same country that needed global help because of Idi Imin and all the human rights violations and murders he sanctioned. You'd think they'd learn not to be so hateful.)
Labels:
civil rights,
gay,
intolerance,
same-sex marriage
26 June 2009
A bi-focal view: Gay pride parades - the good, the bad, the ugly
The gay community is not as homogeneous as the non-gays might like to think. We're like the majority - what I refer to as the mainstream non-gays - there are factions, special interest groups, one-issue advocates, the nondescript and the brazen. But this diversity within the community also has its prejudices, and we all don't love the same things. It seems to be politically-incorrect that I and some other gays have little tolerance for gay pride parades. My own taste in parades would encompass... no, wait a minute... I don't think I like any, what I call, frivolous parades, regardless of the message. Being an equal-opportunity curmudgeon, I also cringe when I see a Shriner on a little tricycle, or a mascot in a plush costume coming my way.A gay man's taste in causes and entertainments is as objectified and exclusionary as likes and dislikes are for heterosexuals - I make no apology for what I like.When it comes to Pride parades, it seems that basically everything gaudy that the supporters lining the streets love leaves me cold. I don't get the attraction of scantily-clad guys shaking tail on the floats. (I can appreciate a fit guy in a Speedo, but it is a contextual attraction for me.) I don't get the over-sized butterfly or angel wings worn by roller-skaters, just as I don't get Cirque de Soleil. I don't like bare butts in a public setting, and I'm not even a prude. Even the dykes on bikes are a bore after a while. I've also never been a big fan of drag queens nor a fan of big drag queens - trying too hard to be a simulacrum or send-up of femininity. Similarly, the overly-leathered chunky guys wearing backless chaps try too hard to be uber-masculine and so often fail.
This is not an axe I'm grinding, it is a preference being stated. My personal life story has been mostly good, which I attribute to being open and refusing to be marginalized because of orientation. I've had material success and personal stability. I've been out for 35 years, and have lived openly at work, with neighbours and with my family (though my parents never broached the subject other than to advise me not to talk about it). I'm also in year 27 of my relationship. But there have been the bad and the ugly, including discrimination and gay-bashing in both Halifax and Vancouver. There are still lots of mainstream people hating or barely tolerating us. Even so, man, my gay life has been fun, illuminating, fulfilling and satisfying; I've had no urge to be straight. (And that lack of interest or non-jealousy in walking the straight - and to me, the narrow - path can dismay people.) In a little, bizarre way, I miss the time when it was more mysterious and exotic to be gay. Isn't there always an attraction to the outsider's life as an outlaw?
I don't wish to be Mr. Conventional, nor do I wish to wave from a float. All of this chatter may explain my dichotomous views. My hope is not to be maligned for not appreciating the spectacle - I do not turn my back on the non-homogenized gay community, so to speak, but just the parades. It is also my view that without the courage of parade participants and activists of years past, Canada would never have progressed with gay (i.e. civil and human) rights without these squeaky wheels. To them, I am in debt and I offer my appreciation.
Long live the PRIDE parades... have fun... just leave me out of it. And please, don't hate me for it.
Labels:
civil rights,
dykes on bikes,
gay pride
25 June 2009
A bi-focal view: Looking for work at 57 - so much for the labour shortage
There's been a lot of press that we have a labour shortage, partly attributed to we early retirees. It's been suggested that we should keep working to help alleviate the shortage and pass on our organizational knowledge to the next generation.
I've chaired or sat on hundreds of job interview panels during my career - I know how difficult recruitment can be. Internal politics, union mandates & seniority compromises, and in some cases it's a lousy pool of applicants that compromise successful placement. (And from the applicant's side, ill-prepared or untrained interview panels can be a major barrier when the interviewers are less versed in recruitment than the interviewee.) With all the unknown variables, the process can be painful - no wonder so much recruiting and screening is now done with software. But software cannot discern that special wow factor that only a real person can see.
At 57, I choose to be semi-retired, fortunate to be able to resign from a valued institution, on good terms after a quarter-century in post-secondary administration. To maintain a connection to the real world rather than the retired world, and to bring in some extra money to make life a tad easier, I would like to augment my pension with some part-time work. (At this stage of my life, a full-time gig would really have to excite me to tempt me.)
There is no value in an iteration of all the positions I've applied for, but most were part-time or term positions such as maternity leaves - positions with a finite end date. Of over two dozen jobs I've applied for, I scored three interviews, all positions related to work similar to my career. I am extremely qualified for all three, but was not the successful candidate.
My job search does give me pause: I now suspect that there is more age discrimination out there than I had thought. My post-graduate research into early-retirement and labour trends tended to indicate that there would be lots of work for my demographic because of myriad looming skills shortages. (I believed what the news reported - silly me.) I could offer the desired expertise at a neophyte's wages.
I've never lied on a resume nor in an interview, and my interest in positions more junior to my experience seemed to raise suspicions. In all cases, I intuited that the interviewers seemed more interested in the why of my application than in the quality of my credentials. I'm not sure my desire to dial down my previous workload from full-throttle to part-time or a term appointment was ever understood.
My perception is that I'm also now experiencing what I used to hear about - the rejection of applicants because of over- rather than under-qualifications. Now, I can understand an employer's anxiety when trying to put a long-term team together, but not when the job postings are for part-time or maternity leaves. Also not - as was the case with one of the few full-time positions I applied for - when the employer is adamant that they want a candidate experienced in change management and long-range strategic planning - talents I have that can be vouched for by academic executives and by industry colleagues.
Well... enough with second-guessing myself into a funk, eh? It is the employer's imperative to define, recruit and hire their best fit. It is certainly not my right to win a job I've applied for, but is it not my right to be evaluated on the stated criteria rather than the surface appearance?
My take-away from this: expertise is not necessarily appreciated. No wonder so many near-retirees hold on to their full-time positions long after the best-by date, and the organizations keep paying the higher salaries and the younger people do not get a chance to be mentored upward for succession planning purposes. If the barriers are up to expertise with some wrinkles and gray hair, regardless of how young or energetic an outlook, a position denied on surface attributes will likely result in a shallow execution.
The final lesson from these experiences is that perhaps I will have to join the reputed 50+ percent who lie on their resumes. It may be time to omit some credentials, minimize my expertise, take a few years off my age, and lie through my teeth. That is a sad state, but that may be the new economic reality.
At 57, I choose to be semi-retired, fortunate to be able to resign from a valued institution, on good terms after a quarter-century in post-secondary administration. To maintain a connection to the real world rather than the retired world, and to bring in some extra money to make life a tad easier, I would like to augment my pension with some part-time work. (At this stage of my life, a full-time gig would really have to excite me to tempt me.)
There is no value in an iteration of all the positions I've applied for, but most were part-time or term positions such as maternity leaves - positions with a finite end date. Of over two dozen jobs I've applied for, I scored three interviews, all positions related to work similar to my career. I am extremely qualified for all three, but was not the successful candidate.
My job search does give me pause: I now suspect that there is more age discrimination out there than I had thought. My post-graduate research into early-retirement and labour trends tended to indicate that there would be lots of work for my demographic because of myriad looming skills shortages. (I believed what the news reported - silly me.) I could offer the desired expertise at a neophyte's wages.
I've never lied on a resume nor in an interview, and my interest in positions more junior to my experience seemed to raise suspicions. In all cases, I intuited that the interviewers seemed more interested in the why of my application than in the quality of my credentials. I'm not sure my desire to dial down my previous workload from full-throttle to part-time or a term appointment was ever understood.
My perception is that I'm also now experiencing what I used to hear about - the rejection of applicants because of over- rather than under-qualifications. Now, I can understand an employer's anxiety when trying to put a long-term team together, but not when the job postings are for part-time or maternity leaves. Also not - as was the case with one of the few full-time positions I applied for - when the employer is adamant that they want a candidate experienced in change management and long-range strategic planning - talents I have that can be vouched for by academic executives and by industry colleagues.
Well... enough with second-guessing myself into a funk, eh? It is the employer's imperative to define, recruit and hire their best fit. It is certainly not my right to win a job I've applied for, but is it not my right to be evaluated on the stated criteria rather than the surface appearance?
My take-away from this: expertise is not necessarily appreciated. No wonder so many near-retirees hold on to their full-time positions long after the best-by date, and the organizations keep paying the higher salaries and the younger people do not get a chance to be mentored upward for succession planning purposes. If the barriers are up to expertise with some wrinkles and gray hair, regardless of how young or energetic an outlook, a position denied on surface attributes will likely result in a shallow execution.
The final lesson from these experiences is that perhaps I will have to join the reputed 50+ percent who lie on their resumes. It may be time to omit some credentials, minimize my expertise, take a few years off my age, and lie through my teeth. That is a sad state, but that may be the new economic reality.
Labels:
age discrimination,
semi-retired
10 June 2009
A bi-focal view: Speedos are NOT the work of the devil!
The classic Speedo swimsuit is barely 50 years old, evolving from nylon for the 1956 Olympics, to composite nylon/lycra blends in the 60s - this design and composition, with adjustments, is still with us. What is also still with us is a cyclical derision or fear of this style (aka banana hammock, budgie smuggler, pickle pincher, salami sling, et al). The style is not evil, obscene nor inherently "gay". It's just a piece of fabric, and wearing it just a matter of taste.
(Note that Speedo is actually a trade mark, but like Kleenex for tissues and Xerox for photocopying, Speedo has come to be a generic descriptor of brief men's swimwear.)
An appreciation of this classic swimsuit does not make a guy gay any more than Jockey brand undershorts do, but mainstream society seems to be on a real mad-on about Speedos. Men can (or should be able to) appreciate a slim fit that offers flexible movement, is sporty, and doesn't hide the male torso under reams of sodden material. A Speedo has most, if not all of the attributes important to swimming or sunbathing:
- coverage for decency's sake
- quick-drying
- light but pliable for swimming and diving, and in many cases,
- attractiveness - depending on body type and age
- and good tan lines - if you go in for that
There is a kind of dichotomy happening these days. Other than cut-offs or gym shorts, Speedo was the swimsuit of choice for many guys in the 60s and 70s. Despite other changes in fashion, such as the searing popularity of tattoos and metal studs and rods, Speedos are positively innocent. Yet these days, the Speedo seems to induce a kind of audible smirk - Speedo as punch line. Men use many ploys to be noticed, but many seem to settle for baggy swimwear that does for the male figure what the burka does for the female figure - diminish physical attributes and essentially de-sexualize the male body. Many current men's casual wear visually neuters the male (it's not that long ago when Capri pants (3/4 length) were called peddle-pushers and worn only by women) or infantilizes him (baggy shorts or pants hanging off inches of visible underwear). While all of this is happening, Speedos are infrequently seen but women's bikinis have only gotten skimpier as the bosoms got larger.
Speedos are the male swimwear of choice in Europe and South America regardless of physical conditioning. This approach is more laizzez faire than exhibitionist. The men with youthful or taut bodies may very well flaunt their brief swimsuits, but the out-of-shape or older men just wear the suit rather than the suit wearing them. What is wrong with that - it's the beach or a swimming pool, not High Mass at the Vatican.

Photo by blickwinkel/Alamy from guardian.co.uk
12 Aug 2009
When I was a much younger lad, say... in my 20s and 30s, I swam and tanned at public pools or beaches, wearing a Speedo - zero embarrassment. My view is that context has a place in deciding what is appropriate clothing, whether at the beach or at the shopping centre. Whenever I was away from the pool or sunning spot (canteen trip or short walk) I always wore a t-shirt that offered more coverage, as I didnt' want to feel naked when veering from a swimming or tanning context. My body hadn't changed, but my surroundings had. I accept that a Speedo can connote a cheesy aura if worn out of context, but the suit itself is not to blame. Context is king.
Speedos are the male swimwear of choice in Europe and South America regardless of physical conditioning. This approach is more laizzez faire than exhibitionist. The men with youthful or taut bodies may very well flaunt their brief swimsuits, but the out-of-shape or older men just wear the suit rather than the suit wearing them. What is wrong with that - it's the beach or a swimming pool, not High Mass at the Vatican.

Photo by blickwinkel/Alamy from guardian.co.uk
12 Aug 2009
When I was a much younger lad, say... in my 20s and 30s, I swam and tanned at public pools or beaches, wearing a Speedo - zero embarrassment. My view is that context has a place in deciding what is appropriate clothing, whether at the beach or at the shopping centre. Whenever I was away from the pool or sunning spot (canteen trip or short walk) I always wore a t-shirt that offered more coverage, as I didnt' want to feel naked when veering from a swimming or tanning context. My body hadn't changed, but my surroundings had. I accept that a Speedo can connote a cheesy aura if worn out of context, but the suit itself is not to blame. Context is king.
It's true that not all guys (nor their partners) feel comfortable with the scant coverage provided by a Speedo. I don't think that strange in any way. But the emotional, visceral and nasty reactions from some quarters is really out of scale to the presumed societal infraction. Some people actually interpret Speedo-wearers as harbingers of evil, gay, and perverted (or all rolled into one). Yes, Speedos can be eye-catching, but why concentrate disdain on the brevity of the male swimsuit and not the lady's bikini. Brevity should not indicate a moral lapse. The following comment is one lady's response to the topic Are men's speedos a sin? (christianblogs/christianet.com):
The goal is to focus people on God and Christ as Savior and Lord. We are the only hands, face, body, and action of God that most people see. If it detracts from loving people to Christ and the Father, we need to not do it. Be, say, and do what will draw others to God through what we be, say, and do. If it is about "you", it is probably not good for you because life is about our relationship with God not getting attention from humans.
What that says about Speedos may not be clear, but I believe the subtext equates brief clothes or Speedos with a lack of piety or Christian values. My view is that a visible ankle, elbow, torso, buttocks or male attributes do not imperil purity or religious faith. The hypocrisy is laughable. American Christian schools worship their swim teams (often sponsored by Speedo), track and field, and of course, the juggernaut that is football. Second-skin lycra plays a part in these and most other athletics.
Now, as alluded to earlier, what has superseded the Speedo to a great extent (except in competition) is the board short. If not too long or baggy, they can be attractive and sporty short pants, especially among the young. But they make for a poor swimsuit. Wearing any extraneous material in the water adds weight, and weight impairs performance and can snag and even fall off. What is funny is that guys now often wear the Speedo underneath under their billowing shorts to provide some support.

To return to the issue of appropriateness as dependent on context, some people (not just fundamentalists) have argued that it is not appropriate for women and/or children to see a man in a Speedo. The fear is that some psychological damage will be done and sensibilities forever impaired. But there is no hue and cry that the multitude of barely contained breasts (perhaps better known as boobs, knockers or rack) may affront the uninterested male. I've not heard of any damage to men or children from seeing a woman's butt-floss bikini. If everyone is so fragile, why haven't any gay man gone straight because of all that female flesh and minimal coverage? Ergo, seeing or wearing a Speedo will not drive any straight man gay. And I believe research has suggested that children are fascinated by differences in gender, and more likely to be damaged by having such differences characterized as evil.
Now, as alluded to earlier, what has superseded the Speedo to a great extent (except in competition) is the board short. If not too long or baggy, they can be attractive and sporty short pants, especially among the young. But they make for a poor swimsuit. Wearing any extraneous material in the water adds weight, and weight impairs performance and can snag and even fall off. What is funny is that guys now often wear the Speedo underneath under their billowing shorts to provide some support.

To return to the issue of appropriateness as dependent on context, some people (not just fundamentalists) have argued that it is not appropriate for women and/or children to see a man in a Speedo. The fear is that some psychological damage will be done and sensibilities forever impaired. But there is no hue and cry that the multitude of barely contained breasts (perhaps better known as boobs, knockers or rack) may affront the uninterested male. I've not heard of any damage to men or children from seeing a woman's butt-floss bikini. If everyone is so fragile, why haven't any gay man gone straight because of all that female flesh and minimal coverage? Ergo, seeing or wearing a Speedo will not drive any straight man gay. And I believe research has suggested that children are fascinated by differences in gender, and more likely to be damaged by having such differences characterized as evil.
In closing, I'd like to add that to me there are two other garments that can be more disturbing than a man in a Speedo. A man wearing baggy sweat pants without needed support ends up flaunting their packages. And what can one really say about girls (teens, tweens and sometimes their mothers) with fat hanging over too-low jeans but revealing a thong stretched near breaking point. I've personally seen that several times in restaurants - no self-awareness at all. Now, that is scary, and surely an affront to decency but no indictments from the pulpit are pending.
Whether wet or dry, cotton or lycra, Speedo or sweatpants, ultimately it's all a matter of taste, a matter of degree, and a matter of choice. And if you think I advocate everyone wear Speedos, you can relax. Consider the context. It's a matter of choice and appropriateness. But please consider that if I choose to don a Speedo in public, it does not automatically mean that I'm:
Whether wet or dry, cotton or lycra, Speedo or sweatpants, ultimately it's all a matter of taste, a matter of degree, and a matter of choice. And if you think I advocate everyone wear Speedos, you can relax. Consider the context. It's a matter of choice and appropriateness. But please consider that if I choose to don a Speedo in public, it does not automatically mean that I'm:
A) delusional as to my appearance
B) an exhibitionist
C) an anarchist, nor
D) the spawn of the Devil.
That's it for now... enjoy the summer regardless of what you wear and let's give the Speedo snarkiness a rest.
Labels:
board shorts,
budgie smugler,
gay,
lycra,
spandex,
Speedo
01 June 2009
A bi-focal view: Piddling my way to Flomax

Some of my jottings concern aging and health issues. Boring... perhaps... reality... definitely.
For several years, since my late 40s, I've been making multiple "pee" trips during the night, often five times in about seven hours. There was no warning whether there'd be a trickle or a flood. Since I'm not a person who sleeps the night through, traipsing to the bathroom could have been even more bothersome, but getting out of bed was still annoying. For the most part, I'm healthy, though carrying slothful extra pounds. I have the prostate digital exam every year, and annual PSA blood tests also show no cancer. But this multiple "going" still nagged at me, so my GP sent me to a urologist to get things checked out.
Well... there are procedures that I never knew about (and people think I'm a hypochondriac). Over the course of a few months, all the appointments fell into place. The first was a "flow test"... I had to ensure that my bladder was full and that I was near the point of losing control (much like a task I've seen on a cruel Japanese game show). Then I was directed to a room wherein there was a funnel device that you urinated into (a uroflowmeter). Something like peeing in a Militta filter funnel, but metal and attached to equipment.
After this, you lay down and a technician puts jelly on your belly, and one makes the usual lame jokes about "when am I going to have the baby" etc, since the procedure does bring up images of fetal scans. A piece of thermal paper soon appears from a printer, and the technician can determine how much urine you did not expel. It seems that my flow was not free-flowing enough, and there was too much urine left over.
Another day, another test - much more uncomfortable - was a biopsy of the prostate. Yes, it is done just the way you think, with your ass in the air and a pincer or needle of some kind being inserted and micro bits of tissue being seared off. I think it was ten sharp "clips" - a bit uncomfortable, but not unbearable, and over quickly.
The result of all of this, once the analyses of the uroflowmeter test and the biopsy were done, the follow-up was arranged to see the urologist for the verdict. It seems that I, like so many of us, have an enlarged prostate, but luckily, nothing more serious. The prescription was for Flomax, and I may be on it for years. It does not shrink the prostate, but it opens up the tubes, so to speak, and lets the river flow. A follow-up flow test a month or two later showed little urine left over after a robust interaction with the uroflowmeter.
The change is marvellous: I'm only up about an hour after I go to bed (because of the red wine I had that evening), and once, if at all, during the next five to six hours. Since I also get up to let the dogs out, some nights I'm still going to the bathroom 2+ times, but this is more because I'm already up than because my bladder alerted me. And, the flow is strong, and the piddling is less.
A happy customer (luckily with a prescription plan); all in all, I recommend the medication, but caution that I'm no doctor, and this is just my experience with it. There are side effects, as there are with any pills, and at first you have to be careful not to get too dizzy if you move too fast. But that side effect is now rare, at least for me.
Unlike some people I know, I'm not afraid of going to the doctor. I do not abuse Canada's health care system, and do not clog up emergency rooms if I have a cold. But prevention is the mantra of our health providers, and I believe a scepticism or defensive posture regarding one's health is... well, healthy. By contrast, a good friend likes to say that he doesn't go to doctors, as they seem to find things, but if he doesn't go, he'll be alright. Well, to me that is just ridiculous. I go to avert calamities, not to ignore them. My mantra has long been that "knowledge is power" and I assume my friend's is "ignorance is bliss".
____________________________________________________________
Take note that this is my personal experience with Flomax - there are no guarantees to be discerned here. (And this personal experience is not related to nor remunerated by the manufacturer.)
Labels:
aging male,
Flomax,
prostate
05 May 2009
A bi-focal view: 57 may be the new 67; Loafing may be the new exercise routine
Getting older doesn't take any talent - I think I went to bed at age 30 and woke up at age 57. 30 really seems to be my mental age, and how I picture myself if not looking in a mirror. The intersection of the "I was" with the "eye am" can be amusing, bemusing or confusing - it's what one makes of it.
As I pass through my 50s, I find this intersection to be interesting and liberating, neither missing nor regretting my younger self.
Mentally and emotionally, I feel that my life is more the life that I want, though there are obvious accommodation to physiological and mental changes. I am blessed with relatively good health, so that alone puts me at a great advantage. I have no interest in being younger or hipper as I've been that person. The hollow vanity that I had in my 20s is gone, but one still likes to be appreciated, to look or be looked over - paradoxically, vanity may diminish but ego remains.
While there are many late 50s guys who are in good shape (and likely they are continuing a regime that they started while young), there are some of us who have let ourselves go. When I was younger, I was literally a stick... now I'm over 200 lbs, and just kind of putting up with it. I think the fact that I was diagnosed with clinical depression in 2006 did not help me, since lethargy is a symptom. (And over-eating is not the problem.) Those are my excuses, but they are really not all that credible at this point.
To make a ponderous story concise, it took a long time to get severe tinnitus, plus hearing loss, plus depression, all diagnosed. So, I wasn't in the best shape by the time I started some treatment in late 2006. Then there were legal issues with the insurance company, so my life rather ground to a halt for over two years. But things are now back on track.
I've had some friends tell me that I need to work, as if it is a sign of good citizenry, and that I need the challenges of work. But I think one of my problems is that I seem to enjoy NOT working, after decades of Type A behaviour. But enjoying loafing has brought up some other issues:
Some people might call this a slow death. But I must have really needed the rest. I really did burn the candle on at least three ends: career, graduate school, and ignoring the signs of depression and burn-out. I am now seeking part-time work, not full-time, as I now acknowledge that the need for that elusive life/work balance that was seriously out-of-whack before.
While there are many late 50s guys who are in good shape (and likely they are continuing a regime that they started while young), there are some of us who have let ourselves go. When I was younger, I was literally a stick... now I'm over 200 lbs, and just kind of putting up with it. I think the fact that I was diagnosed with clinical depression in 2006 did not help me, since lethargy is a symptom. (And over-eating is not the problem.) Those are my excuses, but they are really not all that credible at this point.
To make a ponderous story concise, it took a long time to get severe tinnitus, plus hearing loss, plus depression, all diagnosed. So, I wasn't in the best shape by the time I started some treatment in late 2006. Then there were legal issues with the insurance company, so my life rather ground to a halt for over two years. But things are now back on track.
I've had some friends tell me that I need to work, as if it is a sign of good citizenry, and that I need the challenges of work. But I think one of my problems is that I seem to enjoy NOT working, after decades of Type A behaviour. But enjoying loafing has brought up some other issues:
- All I really ever looked forward to when thinking about retirement - you know... that faraway concept when you're younger - was more time to read, and have some peace and quiet to enjoy my books. Well, my tragedy, to be grandiose about it, is that with tinnitus, I am never without noise. It literally follows me around.
- When I bought my house ("bought" is something of an exageration...taking out a substantial mortgage is what I actually did), the purchase was built around having a dedicated "library" in the lower level. I got my wish, and spend a lot of time there. But the more free time I have, the fewer books I've actually finished. Instead, I spend too much time on the net, too much time reading newspapers and the New Yorker and New York, and other time napping.
- Being a procrastinator re: housework is not a new thing. But I find I'm doing less, and putting simple tasks off, more than when I worked. And I only mowed my lawn once in two years... after the first time, my significant other does it.
- In Nova Scotia, we had a very snowy winter. But I only used the snow-blower once. Since we didn't have to drive to work, putting too much effort in the driveway seemed pointless when we could stay in and watch TV or read or web-lurk. In our cul de sac of five new homes, we were the only ones not compelled to clear our driveways within minutes of a snowfall. Oddly, one of our neighbours cleared our driveway for us, several times. Well, there goes any incentive...
- My significant other and I spend a lot of time going to various health professionals - he for diabetes management, me for prostate (Flo-Max does work!) and other things that need tending after age 50.
- We now go to Tim Hortons about three times per week, just to "get out" and about. We see a lot of other white-hairs there.
- We are on first-name basis with the pharmacists at Lawtons Drugs... I've had more meds in the past year than in all previous 56 years.
- And I seem to talk to the dogs a lot more than to most humans.
- But I really enjoy the slower pace (having access to a decent pension does give me a sense of security that others may not have).
Some people might call this a slow death. But I must have really needed the rest. I really did burn the candle on at least three ends: career, graduate school, and ignoring the signs of depression and burn-out. I am now seeking part-time work, not full-time, as I now acknowledge that the need for that elusive life/work balance that was seriously out-of-whack before.
Labels:
aging,
gay,
semi-retired,
tinnitus
07 March 2002
A bi-focal view: Bean Town and renewal
This bit of memoir was originally written in 2002, and edited in 2009.
________________
There have been many catalysts in my life, but Bob R was certainly a major influence on the paths I strode.
Pssst - the photo is me circa in the mid-70s
In 1974, the calligraphy on my Dalhousie University parchment was probably still wet. Getting that first job is not usually easy and often a disappointment. (Nay-sayers have that part right!) Though I was a voracious reader, sorting letters on the midnight shift at the Post Office was not what I had in mind with a BA in English and Sociology. A mind-numbing black hole - I quit after five months in order to save myself from going postal - a career it was not. (And your suspicions are correct - we did read your magazines and yes, some employees, at least then, were drunk and asleep during the entire shift.) I quit and began almost a year on unemployment insurance; in those days one could quit and still live on pogey - yes, the good ol' days, indeed.
I burst out of the closet that year. My memory is that I went to bed straight, woke up, ruminated about a small party the night before and what feelings were invoked, declared myself gay, dried my eyes, and had tea and toast. There is no value in self-recrimination, and my self-esteem was never an issue. I didn't hate myself, feel sorry for myself, nor want to change.
Coming-out is is the reverse of Invasion of the body snatchers, for one night you go to sleep a husk but awake as your true self. It doesn't take long to make new friends when you're young, gregarious, fairly attractive, and have a gay friend to take you around. I was just very relieved to start getting on with it. I have never been overly bothered about being gay, but I was bothered about the mundane issues of day-to-day living such as money and shelter, and worried constantly.
My life took on a picaresque tinge: ribald temptation, exploration, tears and laughter, serial commitment - everything that an evolution of becoming should be. (And can medical science explain how I lived on cigarettes, coffee, and cheese whiz and still have enough energy to go to the disco? Ah, we could party… but I was just dancin' in the dark and needed something more. Bob saw that need.
Bob was a classical musician and expatriate American, about five years older than myself. We were more sympatico than sexual. He once described me as having a crack in my psyche; some kind of hurt that I couldn't explain. Well, I didn't put too much stock in that as being a Cape Bretoner teaches one that self-pity is self-taught. No one spends as much time worrying and over-analyzing than a newly minted gay man with an undergraduate degree and no full-time job. (When I alluded to not feeling self-recriminations, I did not reject self-examination.) So, the self-analytical intellectual me was in conflict with the blue collar 'just get on with it' common sense element of my personality. I was spending too much time thinking about me, and deriding my economic situation. Regardless, I had one eye on life's absurdities and the other on life's catastrophes.
During the summer and fall of '74, Bob taught me about classical music, about itinerant musicians, about loves lost and found, about integrity, and about creativity. But the lesson he best imparted was to convince or remind me that I had talents, was squandering my energies, and that I was stifled by not being exposed to other cities and other influences.
My apartment lease had run out at year's end, predicating a move to my friend Doug's place.
Bob was concerned with my well-being, as I was spending too much time in limbo at Doug's and not enough time looking after my physical and metaphysical beings.
Slipping into a funk, unemployed, in debt, living in a borrowed room were simply not conducive to personal growth. My first two 'serious' affairs had ended, and I had only been a 'practicing homosexual' for eight months. (Don't you love that expression 'practicing homosexual'… and there is no diploma for this apprenticeship.)
Slipping into a funk, unemployed, in debt, living in a borrowed room were simply not conducive to personal growth. My first two 'serious' affairs had ended, and I had only been a 'practicing homosexual' for eight months. (Don't you love that expression 'practicing homosexual'… and there is no diploma for this apprenticeship.)
But being young, wasteful and not a little foolish, I couldn't necessarily correlate my behaviour with situational outcome. Bob, being an older and wiser man (and those five years seemed vast to an ageist young gay-about-town), had no doubt seen all of my behaviour before or behaved in a similar fashion when fresh to the scene. He couldn't rescue me from myself, but he could show me a larger picture outside myself.
Bob planned on taking a violin to Boston for repairs, and he was willing to drive thirteen hours to get there. He offered to take me to Boston, and on a side trip to New York. I had little money, so he was offering a subsidized trip. I was astonished, as he had to live thriftily on his musician's earnings. He did a good job of cajoling me, and off we went.
The car (an aging Renault, of all things) got us to Boston, with a few stops for gas and food. (I've had a soft spot for Howard Johnson's ever since.) I didn't drive at the time, so the strain on Bob must have been tremendous. I cannot recall any of our conversations during that trip - I really must have been agog to get out of town and not a little self-absorbed.
We arrived in Boston on St. Patrick's Day 1975 - just how wonderful is that? The way the high towers loomed up over the interchanges just left me speechless, as I had never been in a city with so many towers. Bob navigated the labyrinthine Boston traffic familiar to him from his past, and got us to his friend's rent-controlled, fifth-floor walk-up in a run-down part of the city. But it was heaven to me to be away and in such an interesting place that juxtaposed the academic with the blue collar. In that way, it is like a very big Halifax.
We stayed in Boston a week, and Bob showed me many of his favourite places, including the Harvard Co-op, Filene's bargain basement, the Prudential tower, the Public Library, and numerous other attractions. I even saw Last Tango in Paris (still banned in Nova Scotia at that time - but oddly not banned in Boston), on a double bill with Streetcar Named Desire. It was jarring to see Brando age twenty-five years between reels. I felt terribly grown-up seeing that naughty movie that my friends back home didn't have access to.
Bob also took me to the other Boston Museum of Fine Arts, the cruise bar called Sporters. Seems I was a hit in most of Boston's bars, but then again, a 23-year old gay ego can see interest where interest may not be. Bob looked after me and Mother needn't have worried that I would be murdered or spirited away against my will.
Bob also paid for Amtrak tickets to New York, wherein we spent a weekend at his friend Merrill's place. Merrill was honest to God in show business, being a producer/director at CBS. Merrill graciously put us up in his apartment. New York was a dream given form, as being in New York was a goal from the first time I saw all those high towers on TV. Among many attractions, I got to the Empire State Building, Radio City Music Hall, Greenwich Village, but sadly, no time for the Statue of Liberty. Even now, whenever I travel, I want to see the iconic attractions. When in Australia, it was the Sydney Opera House; when in Kyoto, it was the Temple of the Golden Pavilion. I don't spend my type hiking, skiing, nor back-packing - I spend my vacation eating, drinking and ruminating.
Staying with Merrill in Manhattan had distinct advantages, as he was a bona fide television hyphenate, a director-and-producer. A week earlier I had been eating muffins in a Halifax coffee shop, and here I was, one of many of Merrill's guests having dinner with Pierre Boulez in the CBS dining room. This was very heady stuff for an unemployed guy from Halifax. From the sublime to the mundane - Merrill also had the first VCR and Mr. Coffee that I ever saw - I've been addicted to those gadgets ever since.
Shortly after the return to Boston by Amtrak, we drove back to Halifax. After getting us through New England, the Renault had to be abandoned in Moncton, as it expended its life force on catching fire rather than reaching Halifax. We arrived home by train the next day, (also my first train trip), tired but satiated. What else could one want from a trip?
Education, entertainment and excitement, with a dash of glamour tossed into the mix.
Education, entertainment and excitement, with a dash of glamour tossed into the mix.
Aside from those elements, the fallout was far more riveting than that. Not to get all Robert Frostian here, but there are junctures in one's life. I had reached a nexus upon which the rest of my life touched. The core element of the trip was that Bob could see that I needed a kick-start to the rest of my life. Previously, I lived my life shaken but not stirred, and now I could be stirred and not shaken.
Well, things did start to change, or should I say that I changed things. I was renewed and now seemed to have a willingness to try new things. Within six weeks of returning from the trip, I sold most of what I owned, and headed for Toronto with Doug. (Leaving the Maritimes for Toronto is almost a rite of passage in the Maritimes and is known as goin' down the road.) While we bounced from friends' apartments in Toronto to friends' apartments in Ottawa (not such a big change after all), and I only stayed away for good for barely a month, there was an epiphanic change in me that transcended the return to Halifax.
Back in Halifax, I detoured as a disc jockey in a pseudo-gay lounge (in those days, there was still a degree of duplicity in clubs), then the miraculous happened - I got a full-time job in Classic's Bookshop. (Working in a bookstore was a kind of goal of mine, and this became the real start to the rest of my life.) Now, while the money was border-line poverty level, it was the right job at the right time for me. Here I am, 34 years later, back in Halifax semi-retired from a successful (award-winning, but that's another story) college bookstore management and senior administration career, and now a hyphenate in my own right: writer-manager-night school instructor. I lived a very good life in Vancouver for close to 30 years. Ted and I have been together for over 25 years; I've earned an MBA and teaching diploma, and am long-retired from both smoking and disco-dancing.
While Bob and I have lost personal touch, I've heard that he lives in Toronto and still looks terrific. I wonder if he thinks about that long-ago trip to Boston and New York. But as Bob is a giver rather than a taker, it is likely just one in a long stream of kindnesses, and he would have no idea how truly inspirational and life-altering that excursion actually was.
...Michael de Breton... revised September 2009
Labels:
gay,
looking back
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














